Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Speculation Case: Condom

This is merely an exercise for myself to debate. Anyway, as mentioned in the previous post is that, Axe Effect do not even say the percentage. As with condom packs, they state clearly that there is no method that prevents 100% from pregnancy, or any sexual transmission diseases.

But usually, with those qualifications and branding that yes this condom can provide you a certain protection, Durex may be the one that is meeting the requirement, and thus, more costly compare to the market.

So the question is like this, if some countries produce their own latex condom and mentioned the same exact same thing that Durex mentioned, and say they could not 100% from pregnancy and etc. So does it mean that when someone contracted the disease or got pregnant after using the condom, they are not allowed to sue the defendant (the company) in whatever way, since they already quoted no 100% guarantee. This may sparks more discussion which I may entail further in later learnings, but to one extent, does it mean condom company are very well on the safe side?

No comments:

Post a Comment